Current:Home > FinanceBenjamin Ashford|You could buy a house in Baltimore for $1, after plan OK'd to sell some city-owned properties -MoneyMatrix
Benjamin Ashford|You could buy a house in Baltimore for $1, after plan OK'd to sell some city-owned properties
PredictIQ View
Date:2025-04-07 22:58:38
Baltimore officials approved a program that would sell city-owned vacant homes for as little as $1.
The Benjamin Ashfordcity's Board of Estimates voted on the program during a meeting on Wednesday morning, despite pushback from City Council President Nick Mosby.
The board passed the new pricing structure for city-owned vacant homes on the "Buy Into BMore" website in a four-to-one vote where Mosby was the sole opposition.
Baltimore has over 13,500 vacant properties, nearly 900 of which are owned by the city, according to the Department of Housing and Community Development.
The fixed-price program would only apply to certain city-owned properties, according to a page on DHCD's website.
Buyers need to promise to fix up the homes
Those purchasing a home in the program must promise to renovate the property and have at least $90,000 to fix it up. Owners must also move in within a year, and stay in the home for five years.
During Wednesday's meeting, Mosby said the program does not have guardrails written in place that would ensure city residents had priority to buy these homes and won't be forced out of these neighborhoods when their conditions improve.
“If affordability and affordable home ownership and equity and all of the nice words we like to use are really at the core competency as it relates to property disposition, this is a really bad policy,” Mosby said. “This is a bad policy because it doesn’t protect or prioritize the rights of folks in these communities.”
Who can buy a home for $1?
As part of the program, only individual buyers and community land trusts would be able to purchase the properties for $1. Nonprofits with 50 or fewer employees would pay $1,000 while developers and nonprofits with more than 50 employees would have to pay $3,000.
veryGood! (8364)
Related
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Nico Collins' quiet rise with Texans reflects standout receiver's soft-spoken style
- Chiefs QB Patrick Mahomes initially didn't notice broken helmet, said backup 'was frozen'
- Deion Sanders wants to hire Warren Sapp at Colorado, but Sapp's history raises concerns
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- The True Story Behind Apple TV+'s Black Bird
- Margaritaville license plates, Jimmy Buffett highway proposed to honor late Florida singer
- Demonstrations against the far right held in Germany following a report on a deportation meeting
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- The Latest Cafecore Trend Brings Major Coffeeshop Vibes Into Your Home
Ranking
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- In Ecuador, the global reach of Mexico’s warring drug cartels fuels a national crisis
- Texas Gov. Greg Abbott denies he's advocating shooting migrants crossing Texas-Mexico border
- In Iowa, GOP presidential candidates concerned about impact of freezing temperatures on caucus turnout
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Why Los Angeles Rams Quarterback Matthew Stafford Is the MVP of Football Girl Dads
- Citigroup to cut 20,000 jobs by 2026 following latest financial losses
- NTSB investigating 2 Brightline high speed train crashes that killed 3 people in Florida this week
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny helped drive over 4 trillion global music streams in 2023, report finds
Louisiana woman grew a cabbage the size of a small child, setting record for massive produce
These Storage Solutions for Small Spaces Are Total Gamechangers
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Tom Shales, longtime TV critic, dies at 79
Opinion: Women with obesity are often restricted from IVF. That's discriminatory
Supreme Court to hear case on Starbucks' firing of pro-union baristas