Current:Home > ContactA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -MoneyMatrix
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-08 09:54:57
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (16559)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Climate Protesters Take to the Field at the Congressional Baseball Game
- Climate protesters disrupt congressional baseball game, Republicans have 31-11 decisive victory
- 2 dead in single-engine plane crash in Northern California
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Woman wins 2 lottery prizes in months, takes home $300,000
- Maine shooting exposes gaps in mental health treatment and communication practices
- Garcia’s game-ending hit off Holmes gives Royals 4-3 win over Yankees
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- House Republicans vote to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt | The Excerpt
Ranking
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Apparent Gaza activists hurl paint at homes of Brooklyn Museum leaders, including Jewish director
- Country Singer Cole Swindell Shares Sweet Update on Wedding to Courtney Little
- Bijou Phillips Confirms Romance with Jamie Mazur After Danny Masterson Breakup
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Halle Bailey Reveals She Back to Her Pre-Baby Weight 7 Months After Welcoming Son Halo
- Rihanna Shares Struggles With Postpartum Hair Loss
- How Paul Tremblay mined a lifelong love of scary films to craft new novel 'Horror Movie'
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Khloe Kardashian Reveals Kim Kardashian's Unexpected Reaction to Her Boob Job Confession
Jan. 6 offenders have paid only a fraction of restitution owed for damage to U.S. Capitol during riot
Phoenix police have pattern of violating civil rights and using excessive force, Justice Dept. says
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
Criticism of Luka Doncic mounting with each Mavericks loss in NBA Finals
David Wroblewski's newest book Familiaris earns him his 2nd entry into Oprah's Book Club
Aspects of US restrictions on asylum-seekers may violate international protections, UNHCR chief says