Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -MoneyMatrix
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-17 01:48:02
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Los Angeles County to pay $5M settlement over arrest of election technology company founder
- Fire destroys thousands works of art at the main gallery in Georgia’s separatist region of Abkhazia
- More than 100 cold-stunned turtles rescued after washing ashore frozen in North Carolina
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Husband Ryan Anderson Welcome Cute New Family Member
- With Moldova now on the path to EU membership, the foreign minister resigns
- Latest federal court order favors right to carry guns in some New Mexico public parks
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Daniel Will: How Investment Masters Deal with Market Crashes
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- A Texas school’s punishment of a Black student who wears dreadlocks is going to trial
- The Best Colognes for Men You Won’t Regret Shopping, Just in Time for Valentine’s Day
- Hungary is the last holdout for Sweden’s NATO membership. So when will Orbán follow Turkey’s lead?
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Great Basin tribes want Bahsahwahbee massacre site in Nevada named national monument
- Fly Eagles Fly: Here's what NFL fans listened to on Spotify for the 2023 season
- China says it’s working to de-escalate tensions in the Red Sea that have upended global trade
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
'I just need you to trust me. Please.' Lions coach Dan Campbell's speeches are legendary.
Dry January isn't just for problem drinkers. It's making me wonder why I drink at all.
Thai court says popular politician Pita Limjaroenrat didn’t violate law, can remain a lawmaker
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Did Vanderpump Rules' Scheana Shay Really Make Out With Tom Schwartz? She Says...
Ohio bans gender-affirming care and restricts transgender athletes despite GOP governor’s veto
Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Husband Ryan Anderson Welcome Cute New Family Member