Current:Home > FinanceWisconsin Republicans urge state Supreme Court to reject redistricting report’s findings -MoneyMatrix
Wisconsin Republicans urge state Supreme Court to reject redistricting report’s findings
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:56:48
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Republicans urged the state Supreme Court on Thursday to ignore a report from redistricting consultants that determined GOP-proposed legislative maps were unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.
While Republicans argue that the consultants’ findings are unsound, Democrats asked the court on Thursday to adopt one of their maps that the consultants found were “nearly indistinguishable.”
The stakes are huge in battleground Wisconsin, where Republicans have held a firm grip on control of the Legislature even as Democrats have notched significant statewide wins. Four of the past six presidential elections have been decided by less than a percentage point, while Republicans have increased their majorities under the maps they first drew in 2011 to 22-10 in the Senate and 65-34 in the Assembly.
The liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December that the current Republican-drawn legislative maps were unconstitutional because not all the districts were contiguous. The court ordered the parties involved in the lawsuit to submit new maps that a pair of consultants then reviewed.
With the report and responses now in hand, the court is poised to rule within days or weeks on what the new maps should look like, unless the Republican-controlled Legislature passes maps that Democratic Gov. Tony Evers signs into law first.
Republicans are talking about passing the maps that Evers proposed, which the governor indicated on Wednesday he would sign. Evers last week vetoed maps the Legislature passed that were based on his proposal but made changes to protect Republican incumbents.
Republican Assembly Majority Leader Tyler August said Thursday there have been discussions with Senate Republicans about passing the Evers maps with no changes.
While those talks continue, the Supreme Court accepted responses Thursday from Republicans and Democrats to the consultants’ report. The court and Legislature are facing a March 15 deadline to enact new lines. That is the latest that maps can be in place in order for current filing deadlines for the fall election to be met, according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Attorneys for the Legislature argued in their court filing Thursday that the consultants’ report was about finding a political remedy to redistricting, not addressing the continuity issue.
“There is no judicial power, only political will, to impose any of the Democrats’ sweeping redraws as a judicial remedy,” the Legislature argued.
The Legislature also hints at an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that moving millions of voters from one legislative district to another as the Democratic map proposals would do “raises serious federal constitutional questions.”
The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty made a similar argument, saying adopting the reasoning of the consultants in rejecting it and the Legislature’s maps “would be an egregious due process violation.”
Republicans have also argued that liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz should not have heard the case, given that she called the current Republican maps “rigged” and “unfair” during the campaign and accepted about $10 million in donations from Democrats. She was part of the 4-3 majority that voted to toss the Republican maps.
Evers, in his filing, said only his plan or a similar Democratic submission “will ensure that, for the first time in more than a decade, Wisconsinites are able to exercise their fundamental right to vote in districts that are constitutional, fair, and reflect the will of the people.”
Democratic senators, in their submission, urged adoption of their plan, saying it “offers the best chance for the majority of votes to translate into the majority of legislative seats. The people of the State of Wisconsin will once again be able to choose their representatives, not the other way around.”
veryGood! (28)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Can't afford a home? Why becoming a landlord might be the best way to 'house hack.'
- Spurs coach Gregg Popovich had a stroke earlier this month, is expected to make full recovery
- Alexandra Daddario Shares Candid Photo of Her Postpartum Body 6 Days After Giving Birth
- Sam Taylor
- Jana Kramer’s Ex Mike Caussin Shares Resentment Over Her Child Support Payments
- Crews battle 'rapid spread' conditions against Jennings Creek fire in Northeast
- 3 Iraqis tortured at Abu Ghraib win $42M judgement against defense contractor
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- GreenBox Systems will spend $144 million to build an automated warehouse in Georgia
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Daniele Rustioni to become Metropolitan Opera’s principal guest conductor
- Supreme Court seems likely to allow class action to proceed against tech company Nvidia
- Biden, Harris participate in Veterans Day ceremony | The Excerpt
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Mandy Moore Captures the Holiday Vibe With These No Brainer Gifts & Stocking Stuffer Must-Haves
- The USDA is testing raw milk for the avian flu. Is raw milk safe?
- Alexandra Daddario Shares Candid Photo of Her Postpartum Body 6 Days After Giving Birth
Recommendation
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
How to protect your Social Security number from the Dark Web
Full House's John Stamos Shares Message to Costar Dave Coulier Amid Cancer Battle
Investigation into Chinese hacking reveals ‘broad and significant’ spying effort, FBI says
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Philadelphia mass transit users face fare hikes of more than 20% and possible service cuts
Alexandra Daddario Shares Candid Photo of Her Postpartum Body 6 Days After Giving Birth
Judge sets date for 9/11 defendants to enter pleas, deepening battle over court’s independence